Chapter 8
Long Ago and Originally (Part I)

According to the words of Exodus 20:11, as the de MontSabbathby Version represents, which exhibits accurately all biblical wording, God’s work “throughout” earth’s first seven days is briefly recalled, and recorded in text, while the seventh day specifically remembered is, as follows:

“Throughout six days, Yahweh made the heavens and the earth, the sea and all, which is in them. And he placed1 them in the seventh day. Bountifully, therefore, did Yahweh bestow upon the day of the sabbath, and had made it holy” (deMSby Exodus 20:11).

And this shows the “model†of “your sanctification†or “your holyizationâ€, which “is the will of God†(deMSby I Thessalonians 4:3), which a person must employ, and accordingly must implement, if he or she would obey “the will of Godâ€.

But unless this text is accurately translated, and presented genuinely to its readers, itsbiblical “model†of “your sanctificationâ€, which is God alone, and what he accomplished, and did on the seventh day is shown inaccurately. It must be counterfeit, concealing how you achieve “your sanctificationâ€, which “is the will of God†(deMSby I Thessalonians 4:3).

A. He Alone Exerted

But this the de MontSabbathby Translation is; and definitively it represents this scripture:

“For throughout six days, Yahweh made the heavens and the earth, the sea and all, which is in them. And he placed them in the seventh day. Bountifully, therefore, did Yahweh bestow upon the day of the sabbath, and had made it holy†(deMSby Exodus 20:11).

This the de MontSabbathby Translation is of Exodus 20:11, where this scripture poses in accuracy’s frame. And this yields a wealth of definitive disclosure…

Because: Within what God himself says here (Exodus 20:22) have you been addressed as an audience to this, his own reminiscence, his own recollection, which documents literally the maintenance of the world on the seventh of its days. And as Scripture accurately manifests here, God did not “rest” on the world’s seventh day.

But rather he “placed” “the heavens and the earth, the sea and all, which is in them” “in the seventh day” and as “the seventh day”. Which absolutely wouldn’t, and couldn’t have happened without the Almighty’s having just so “placed”.

 It is he, who induced, and accounted for “the seventh day”. He alone the power and the force could be behind said day’s instance, and what it includes.

Distinctly, this

Is here portrayed

In how “the seventh

Day” was made

Informatively

Is such displayed

Most usefully your

Understanding to aid

Thus God’s having “rested” throughout that day is “ludicrously inappropriate” and just absurd.

B. Of the Same Means

And of course, therein is also explained the arrival and arrangement of all of the universe’s first six days: They too were the issue of the same means of maintenance…

That, which Yahweh had created, and made on the first creation day, “he placed”, and arranged in the second day of the creation. On the second day of the creation, that, which he had created, and made was to be “placed” by him in the third day.

On the third day of the creation, that, which he had created, and made was to be “placed” by him in the fourth day. And so on it continued throughout at least the seventh day: There is certainly no reason to suppose, that the universe attained its “placing” in the first six days through any other mechanism than that employed, and accounting for the seventh day.

C. Two Agendas

Much like the first six days, therefore, a similar development accounted for the seventh:

“And on the seventh day, God completed his work, which he necessarily must have done. And on the seventh day had he already ceased from all his work, which he necessarily had to have made†(deMSby Genesis 2:2).

But starting at the seventh day’s earliest occurrence, God discontinued his making of the universe, in order, that he could begin “his workâ€, his constant daily “placing†and sanctification.

Because: He had finished “his work†at creation.

“Because: Throughout six days, Yahweh made the heavens and the earth, the sea and all, which is in them†(deMSby Exodus 20:11).

God “ceased†at the seventh day’s dawn “all†“workâ€, “which he necessarily had to have madeâ€, in order, that he commence his daily “placingâ€:

“And on the seventh day had he already ceased from all his work, which he necessarily had to have made†(Genesis 2:2b deMSby).

God alone “made†the content of the world’s seventh day, “which he necessarily had to have made†(deMSby Genesis 2:2b), prior to when he began, and “completed his workâ€, his agenda of “placing†and sanctification, “which he necessarily must have done†(deMSby Genesis 2:2b), and had to have done throughout all of the seventh day’s span and event:

“And on the seventh day, God completed his work, which he necessarily must have doneâ€.

Therefore God’s “work” here recalls two agendas of two distinct “seventh day” tasks and initiatives: [1] God “made†the content of the world’s seventh day throughout his involvement with the previous six days (deMSby Genesis 2:2b), which labour he “ceasedâ€, as the seventh day began:

“And on the seventh day had he already ceased from all his work, which he necessarily had to have made”.

And [2] God then arranged, and”placed”this content “in the seventh day” and as “the seventh day” (deMSby Genesis 2:2a):

“And on the seventh day, God completed his work, which he necessarily must have doneâ€.

Which means: God “completedâ€, and finished “on the seventh day†its inventory and “placing†that day, while he sanctified, or made it holy (deMSby Genesis 2:3):

“And God bountifully bestowed upon the seventh day, and had made it holy. For in it, he had ceased from all his work, which God had created for the sake of further use”.

And perhaps you perceive now the biblical assumption of this signal truth, that the “placing” of the seventh day, along with its content and sanctification were labour, which God had “made”, and “done”. He exclusively must have “done†such “workâ€, and “completed†such “workâ€, while he neither “rested†(KJV Exodus 20:11), nor need be “refreshed†(KJV Exodus 31:17).

For what he constructed until that day was “placed” by him to become “the seventh day”, that it become sanctified, or made holy.

2“And on the seventh day, God completed his work, which he necessarily must have done. And on the seventh day had he already ceased from all his work, which he necessarily had to have made. 3And God bountifully bestowed upon the seventh day, and had made it holy2. For in it, he had ceased from all his work, which God had created for the sake of further use3†(deMSby Genesis 2:2-3).

The which makes senseless and “ludicrously inappropriate” any credible feasibility of God’s “rest”.

D. Verbatim Quotation

And this explains why those verses, which cite a verbatim quotation of Exodus 20:11 say absolutely nothing of God’s having “rested”, or having been “refreshed”. They a much more biblical assertion profess, as conspicuous becomes in the following citations of Exodus 20:11, the very same verse, which tradition cites typically to speak of God’s “rest”:

(deMSby Nehemiah 9:6) “Only you, Yahweh are he who made the heavens, the heavens of the heavens with all their host; the earth with all that are on it and the seas with all that are in them, and you are sustaining all of them; and the host of heaven bow down to youâ€.

(deMSby Psalm 146:5b-9) 5“He is happy whose help is the God of Jacob; 6his hope is on Yahweh his God, maker of the heavens and the earth, the sea and all which are in them; the keeper of security forever, 7the doer of justice to the oppressed, the giver of bread to the hungry. 8Yahweh is a liberator of prisoners, Yahweh is an opener of blind eyes, Yahweh is a lifter of those who are bowed, Yahweh is a lover of the righteous. 9Yahweh guards strangers; he will sustain the orphan and the widowâ€.

(deMSby Acts 4:24-28) 24“And those hearing lifted up their voices to God in one accord and said, ‘Master, you are the one making the heavens and the earth, the sea and all in them; 25the one saying by the holy spirit through the mouth of our father David, your child, ‘Why did the nations rage and the peoples imagine empty things? 26The kings of the earth arrayed themselves, and the rulers were gathered in one place against Yahweh and against his anointed one’; 27for truly they were gathered in this city against your holy child, Jesus, whom you anointed; both Herod and Pontius Pilate together with the nations and the peoples of Israel 28to do whatever your hand and your plan had predetermined to occur’â€.

(deMSby Acts 14:15-17) 15“Men, why are you doing these things? We are men of like-nature to you, bringing you the good news to turn from these empty things to the living God, who made the heavens and the earththe sea and all, which are in them; 16who allowed in past generations all the nations to go their own ways. 17Ever doing good works, however, he never left himself without a witness, giving rain from heaven to you with fruitful seasons, filling your hearts with food and joyâ€.

(deMSby Acts 17:24-25) 24“The God, making the universe and all in it is Emperor of heaven and earth; he does not dwell in hand-made temples; 25neither is he served by human hands, as one in need of something. To all, he gives life, breath and everything…â€

For this assembly of Scripture’s own authors, verbatim quotation of Exodus 20:11 is not an occasion to prattle in remembrance of God’s having “rested”.

And their pertinent comments, recalling this scripture communicate the opposite to any such claim, and the absolute antithesis are to such: They are unaware of God’s having “rested” (KJV Exodus 20:11), or having been “refreshed” (KJV Exodus 31:17). They perceive very different occupation for God, as plainly is displayed in these above verses, and equally confirmed is in these verses.

E. Scripture’s Best “Commentators”

Which for yourself, sir or madam, you see. For conspicuously documented is it above.

And acknowledge must we, and admit we must, that, Scripture’s best “commentators” are irrefutably those, who the authors are of Scripture’s pages, those, who composers are of Scripture’s verses. They are the best “commentators” of Scripture. And any disagreement with this is fallacious.

Therefore, of God’s ever truly having “rested” and that actual occupation, which involves God, above is authoritative judgment of such: Above is his seventh day schedule recorded.

Above is his everyday schedule epitomized. And for God realistically, biblically, particularly and practically, how much “rest” do you see above?

F. As First Occasioned

Furthermore, in this, the de MontSabbathby Version of Exodus 20:11 and Genesis 2:2, latent is absolute and undeniable certainty, affirming this subtle and simple proposition: Of what becomes of earth’s “seventh day”, and anything, subsequently happening to follow, the next day, the eighth day and its particular “placing” would never have occurred, in the absence of Yahweh God’s having “placed”, and arranged in that day as well “the heavens and the earth, the sea and all, which is in them”. It must result from the very same Providence, as first occasioned the previous seven days.

G. Of That Same Impetus

Beside this, there is the additional assumption, that the ninth day, the tenth day, the ten millionth day and “this day” were all to be the issue of that same impetus, that same Force, which occurred, brought about, and induced the seventh day: They too would transpire as nothing other than God’s “arrangement”, personal “placing”, his own “disposition” of each single part of his entire creation in each single day, initiated on the seventh…

“For throughout six days, Yahweh made the heavens and the earth. And on the seventh day, he ceased. And ithas been restored4” (deMSby Exodus 31:17)…

And “restored” this day…

“It” “restored” “has been”: “It” occurs “this day”, and recurs “this day”.

Yes: “The seventh day” effectively happens “this day”. Consequently is “the seventh day” “restored” this day.

For it starts, and develops, as necessarily must it from God’s having long ago “ceased” from what he originally made “for the sake of further use” (deMSby Genesis 2:3):

“And God bountifully bestowed upon the seventh day, and had made it holy. For in it, he had ceased from all his work, which God had created for the sake of further use“.

While he ever busy remains at “placing” and his sanctifying everything he created, thus anything, that constitutes the universe’s furnishings. Which God “created for the sake of further useâ€.

And this explains why we encouraged are all to “remember the day of the ‘sabbath’ [or ‘ceasing’]â€, the day God “ceased†his creation of the universe, “to make it holyâ€, or “sanctify it”, precisely as was God’s agenda that day. For that, which God has “restored” this day (deMSby Exodus 31:17), and “restores” every day must specify, and certify “the will of God”, which “your sanctification†will permanently be. But further clarification of this is to come…

1Despite its conspicuous contrast and difference, this translation, the de MontSabbathby Version of Exodus 20:11 is of at least equal linguistic accuracy to traditional translations, which steadfastly document God’s having “rested”. But as divulged by the foregoing chapters, they to themselves must be inconsistent as well as to biblical Scripture in general. However, by this, the de MontSabbathby Version, they are immeasurably exceeded, and excelled in translation accuracy, biblical consistence and “truthfulness” (deMSby John 17:17) itself.

2Somewhat unavoidably, the meaning of “holy†must yet be vague, indistinct and obscure. But please: Persevere; and continue your reading. And you understanding will thereby acquire.

3No doubt, you are at least somewhat inclined to caution, if not suspicion at my untraditional translation of Scripture’s Hebrew here: Why, you may ask, is this particular verse represented in a way, that is not the same as traditional translations?

But my invariable response this reiterates: Accuracy must our priority remain. And that must exclusively our priority be, which must precedence take to predominant tradition…

For what emerges in Genesis 2:3, and how the traditional translations display it is adaptation of Scripture’s actual Hebrew wording, to re-write it, and re-fashion it to render it consistent and compatible to tradition. And nothing more than this accounts for how Genesis 2:3 traditionally is rendered, and typically translated:

“So God blessed the seventh day and hallowed it, because on it God rested from all his work which he had done in creation†(RSV Genesis 2:3).

For one immediately presented is here this ludicrous tradition, which is addressed above…

Somehow, “God blessed the seventh day and hallowed itâ€, while, simultaneously he “rested†that day “from all his work which he had done in creationâ€, which even God Almighty can’t possibly have done. This same incongruity and blatant contradiction are tradition, that predominates throughout this scripture, which empties, and replaces its legitimate biblical meaning, and re-writes it in a way, that leaves it little practical meaning, due to how contradiction thus consumes this scripture.

It is almost as if, therefore, the translators here realized, that there is sufficient contradiction in this scripture, without including reference to “all his work, which God had created for the sake of further useâ€, as this verse’s Hebrew is accurately rendered:

“And God bountifully bestowed upon the seventh day, and had made it holy. For in it, he had ceased from all his work, which God had created for the sake of further use” (deMSby Genesis 2:3).

For to what “use†would God put such “workâ€, during his having “rested from all his work which he had done in creation†(RSV Genesis 2:3)?

Which seems traditionally to be God’s agenda throughout “the seventh day†(while simultaneously and at the same time he “blessed the seventh day and hallowed it†[RSV Genesis 2:3]). To what additional or “further use†could God have applied this above mentioned “workâ€, while he merely “rested†throughout “the seventh dayâ€, as is inferred by traditional translation?

Thus, that the reader be spared this dilemma, and needn’t be concerned about such “further useâ€, the biblical Hebrew wording is dissembled somewhat, and is given a translation, that fashions as reflection of predominant tradition:

“So God blessed the seventh day and hallowed it, because on it God rested from all his work which he had done in creation†(RSV Genesis 2:3).

For as we did initially note, a person nothing does, while he is at “restâ€. And of “his work†makes no “further useâ€, while at his “restâ€, and thereby effectively is doing nothing. And thus speaks tradition of God’s “seventh dayâ€, which Genesis 2:3 (RSV) well exhibits, and exemplifies.

4Like Exodus 20:11, Exodus 31:17 has two; yes two equally accurate translations. Yes: This verse has two accurate renderings.

But you can see, how a translator’s choice of one or the other is somewhat predestined, and predetermined is by way of his choice of tradition’s translation of Exodus 20:11, or his choosing the de MontSabbathby Version of Exodus 20:11.

For once having chosen the traditional translation, his treatment of a related, later scripture must representative be, and consistent must be to what he has previously done in translation. And that is specifically the reason why the Almighty is “refreshed†in this verse, Exodus 31:17, rather than the seventh day’s having been “restored†(deMSby Exodus 31:17).

Because: In Exodus 20:11, which “comes before†Exodus 31:17, all the traditional, established translations record, that Almighty God “rested the seventh dayâ€, which must determine, and stipulate how they ultimately treat this related, later verse, Exodus 31:17…

They must together say, and must in unison profess, and avow, as has their tradition long given them to predicate: God, the Almighty “was refreshed†on “the seventh day†(KJV Exodus 31:17).

Which sounds as strange and unbiblical to them, as does it to us, and recites it to us. But they so committed are to our traditions, as to make greater urgency of them than Scripture.

They to tradition are much more attentive, than are they attentive to Scripture itself. And that must determine how they translate, and exhibit this scripture, Exodus 31:17, recalling, that God, the Almighty “was refreshedâ€.

Posted in

Chapter 8
Long Ago and Originally (Part I)

According to the words of Exodus 20:11, as the de MontSabbathby Version represents, which exhibits accurately all biblical wording, God’s work “throughout” earth’s first seven days is briefly recalled, and recorded in text, while the seventh day specifically remembered is, as follows:

“Throughout six days, Yahweh made the heavens and the earth, the sea and all, which is in them. And he placed1 them in the seventh day. Bountifully, therefore, did Yahweh bestow upon the day of the sabbath, and had made it holy” (deMSby Exodus 20:11).

And this shows the “model†of “your sanctification†or “your holyizationâ€, which “is the will of God†(deMSby I Thessalonians 4:3), which a person must employ, and accordingly must implement, if he or she would obey “the will of Godâ€.

But unless this text is accurately translated, and presented genuinely to its readers, itsbiblical “model†of “your sanctificationâ€, which is God alone, and what he accomplished, and did on the seventh day is shown inaccurately. It must be counterfeit, concealing how you achieve “your sanctificationâ€, which “is the will of God†(deMSby I Thessalonians 4:3).

A. He Alone Exerted

But this the de MontSabbathby Translation is; and definitively it represents this scripture:

“For throughout six days, Yahweh made the heavens and the earth, the sea and all, which is in them. And he placed them in the seventh day. Bountifully, therefore, did Yahweh bestow upon the day of the sabbath, and had made it holy†(deMSby Exodus 20:11).

This the de MontSabbathby Translation is of Exodus 20:11, where this scripture poses in accuracy’s frame. And this yields a wealth of definitive disclosure…

Because: Within what God himself says here (Exodus 20:22) have you been addressed as an audience to this, his own reminiscence, his own recollection, which documents literally the maintenance of the world on the seventh of its days. And as Scripture accurately manifests here, God did not “rest” on the world’s seventh day.

But rather he “placed” “the heavens and the earth, the sea and all, which is in them” “in the seventh day” and as “the seventh day”. Which absolutely wouldn’t, and couldn’t have happened without the Almighty’s having just so “placed”.

 It is he, who induced, and accounted for “the seventh day”. He alone the power and the force could be behind said day’s instance, and what it includes.

Distinctly, this

Is here portrayed

In how “the seventh

Day” was made

Informatively

Is such displayed

Most usefully your

Understanding to aid

Thus God’s having “rested” throughout that day is “ludicrously inappropriate” and just absurd.

B. Of the Same Means

And of course, therein is also explained the arrival and arrangement of all of the universe’s first six days: They too were the issue of the same means of maintenance…

That, which Yahweh had created, and made on the first creation day, “he placed”, and arranged in the second day of the creation. On the second day of the creation, that, which he had created, and made was to be “placed” by him in the third day.

On the third day of the creation, that, which he had created, and made was to be “placed” by him in the fourth day. And so on it continued throughout at least the seventh day: There is certainly no reason to suppose, that the universe attained its “placing” in the first six days through any other mechanism than that employed, and accounting for the seventh day.

C. Two Agendas

Much like the first six days, therefore, a similar development accounted for the seventh:

“And on the seventh day, God completed his work, which he necessarily must have done. And on the seventh day had he already ceased from all his work, which he necessarily had to have made†(deMSby Genesis 2:2).

But starting at the seventh day’s earliest occurrence, God discontinued his making of the universe, in order, that he could begin “his workâ€, his constant daily “placing†and sanctification.

Because: He had finished “his work†at creation.

“Because: Throughout six days, Yahweh made the heavens and the earth, the sea and all, which is in them†(deMSby Exodus 20:11).

God “ceased†at the seventh day’s dawn “all†“workâ€, “which he necessarily had to have madeâ€, in order, that he commence his daily “placingâ€:

“And on the seventh day had he already ceased from all his work, which he necessarily had to have made†(Genesis 2:2b deMSby).

God alone “made†the content of the world’s seventh day, “which he necessarily had to have made†(deMSby Genesis 2:2b), prior to when he began, and “completed his workâ€, his agenda of “placing†and sanctification, “which he necessarily must have done†(deMSby Genesis 2:2b), and had to have done throughout all of the seventh day’s span and event:

“And on the seventh day, God completed his work, which he necessarily must have doneâ€.

Therefore God’s “work” here recalls two agendas of two distinct “seventh day” tasks and initiatives: [1] God “made†the content of the world’s seventh day throughout his involvement with the previous six days (deMSby Genesis 2:2b), which labour he “ceasedâ€, as the seventh day began:

“And on the seventh day had he already ceased from all his work, which he necessarily had to have made”.

And [2] God then arranged, and”placed”this content “in the seventh day” and as “the seventh day” (deMSby Genesis 2:2a):

“And on the seventh day, God completed his work, which he necessarily must have doneâ€.

Which means: God “completedâ€, and finished “on the seventh day†its inventory and “placing†that day, while he sanctified, or made it holy (deMSby Genesis 2:3):

“And God bountifully bestowed upon the seventh day, and had made it holy. For in it, he had ceased from all his work, which God had created for the sake of further use”.

And perhaps you perceive now the biblical assumption of this signal truth, that the “placing” of the seventh day, along with its content and sanctification were labour, which God had “made”, and “done”. He exclusively must have “done†such “workâ€, and “completed†such “workâ€, while he neither “rested†(KJV Exodus 20:11), nor need be “refreshed†(KJV Exodus 31:17).

For what he constructed until that day was “placed” by him to become “the seventh day”, that it become sanctified, or made holy.

2“And on the seventh day, God completed his work, which he necessarily must have done. And on the seventh day had he already ceased from all his work, which he necessarily had to have made. 3And God bountifully bestowed upon the seventh day, and had made it holy2. For in it, he had ceased from all his work, which God had created for the sake of further use3†(deMSby Genesis 2:2-3).

The which makes senseless and “ludicrously inappropriate” any credible feasibility of God’s “rest”.

D. Verbatim Quotation

And this explains why those verses, which cite a verbatim quotation of Exodus 20:11 say absolutely nothing of God’s having “rested”, or having been “refreshed”. They a much more biblical assertion profess, as conspicuous becomes in the following citations of Exodus 20:11, the very same verse, which tradition cites typically to speak of God’s “rest”:

(deMSby Nehemiah 9:6) “Only you, Yahweh are he who made the heavens, the heavens of the heavens with all their host; the earth with all that are on it and the seas with all that are in them, and you are sustaining all of them; and the host of heaven bow down to youâ€.

(deMSby Psalm 146:5b-9) 5“He is happy whose help is the God of Jacob; 6his hope is on Yahweh his God, maker of the heavens and the earth, the sea and all which are in them; the keeper of security forever, 7the doer of justice to the oppressed, the giver of bread to the hungry. 8Yahweh is a liberator of prisoners, Yahweh is an opener of blind eyes, Yahweh is a lifter of those who are bowed, Yahweh is a lover of the righteous. 9Yahweh guards strangers; he will sustain the orphan and the widowâ€.

(deMSby Acts 4:24-28) 24“And those hearing lifted up their voices to God in one accord and said, ‘Master, you are the one making the heavens and the earth, the sea and all in them; 25the one saying by the holy spirit through the mouth of our father David, your child, ‘Why did the nations rage and the peoples imagine empty things? 26The kings of the earth arrayed themselves, and the rulers were gathered in one place against Yahweh and against his anointed one’; 27for truly they were gathered in this city against your holy child, Jesus, whom you anointed; both Herod and Pontius Pilate together with the nations and the peoples of Israel 28to do whatever your hand and your plan had predetermined to occur’â€.

(deMSby Acts 14:15-17) 15“Men, why are you doing these things? We are men of like-nature to you, bringing you the good news to turn from these empty things to the living God, who made the heavens and the earththe sea and all, which are in them; 16who allowed in past generations all the nations to go their own ways. 17Ever doing good works, however, he never left himself without a witness, giving rain from heaven to you with fruitful seasons, filling your hearts with food and joyâ€.

(deMSby Acts 17:24-25) 24“The God, making the universe and all in it is Emperor of heaven and earth; he does not dwell in hand-made temples; 25neither is he served by human hands, as one in need of something. To all, he gives life, breath and everything…â€

For this assembly of Scripture’s own authors, verbatim quotation of Exodus 20:11 is not an occasion to prattle in remembrance of God’s having “rested”.

And their pertinent comments, recalling this scripture communicate the opposite to any such claim, and the absolute antithesis are to such: They are unaware of God’s having “rested” (KJV Exodus 20:11), or having been “refreshed” (KJV Exodus 31:17). They perceive very different occupation for God, as plainly is displayed in these above verses, and equally confirmed is in these verses.

E. Scripture’s Best “Commentators”

Which for yourself, sir or madam, you see. For conspicuously documented is it above.

And acknowledge must we, and admit we must, that, Scripture’s best “commentators” are irrefutably those, who the authors are of Scripture’s pages, those, who composers are of Scripture’s verses. They are the best “commentators” of Scripture. And any disagreement with this is fallacious.

Therefore, of God’s ever truly having “rested” and that actual occupation, which involves God, above is authoritative judgment of such: Above is his seventh day schedule recorded.

Above is his everyday schedule epitomized. And for God realistically, biblically, particularly and practically, how much “rest” do you see above?

F. As First Occasioned

Furthermore, in this, the de MontSabbathby Version of Exodus 20:11 and Genesis 2:2, latent is absolute and undeniable certainty, affirming this subtle and simple proposition: Of what becomes of earth’s “seventh day”, and anything, subsequently happening to follow, the next day, the eighth day and its particular “placing” would never have occurred, in the absence of Yahweh God’s having “placed”, and arranged in that day as well “the heavens and the earth, the sea and all, which is in them”. It must result from the very same Providence, as first occasioned the previous seven days.

G. Of That Same Impetus

Beside this, there is the additional assumption, that the ninth day, the tenth day, the ten millionth day and “this day” were all to be the issue of that same impetus, that same Force, which occurred, brought about, and induced the seventh day: They too would transpire as nothing other than God’s “arrangement”, personal “placing”, his own “disposition” of each single part of his entire creation in each single day, initiated on the seventh…

“For throughout six days, Yahweh made the heavens and the earth. And on the seventh day, he ceased. And ithas been restored4” (deMSby Exodus 31:17)…

And “restored” this day…

“It” “restored” “has been”: “It” occurs “this day”, and recurs “this day”.

Yes: “The seventh day” effectively happens “this day”. Consequently is “the seventh day” “restored” this day.

For it starts, and develops, as necessarily must it from God’s having long ago “ceased” from what he originally made “for the sake of further use” (deMSby Genesis 2:3):

“And God bountifully bestowed upon the seventh day, and had made it holy. For in it, he had ceased from all his work, which God had created for the sake of further use“.

While he ever busy remains at “placing” and his sanctifying everything he created, thus anything, that constitutes the universe’s furnishings. Which God “created for the sake of further useâ€.

And this explains why we encouraged are all to “remember the day of the ‘sabbath’ [or ‘ceasing’]â€, the day God “ceased†his creation of the universe, “to make it holyâ€, or “sanctify it”, precisely as was God’s agenda that day. For that, which God has “restored” this day (deMSby Exodus 31:17), and “restores” every day must specify, and certify “the will of God”, which “your sanctification†will permanently be. But further clarification of this is to come…

1Despite its conspicuous contrast and difference, this translation, the de MontSabbathby Version of Exodus 20:11 is of at least equal linguistic accuracy to traditional translations, which steadfastly document God’s having “rested”. But as divulged by the foregoing chapters, they to themselves must be inconsistent as well as to biblical Scripture in general. However, by this, the de MontSabbathby Version, they are immeasurably exceeded, and excelled in translation accuracy, biblical consistence and “truthfulness” (deMSby John 17:17) itself.

2Somewhat unavoidably, the meaning of “holy†must yet be vague, indistinct and obscure. But please: Persevere; and continue your reading. And you understanding will thereby acquire.

3No doubt, you are at least somewhat inclined to caution, if not suspicion at my untraditional translation of Scripture’s Hebrew here: Why, you may ask, is this particular verse represented in a way, that is not the same as traditional translations?

But my invariable response this reiterates: Accuracy must our priority remain. And that must exclusively our priority be, which must precedence take to predominant tradition…

For what emerges in Genesis 2:3, and how the traditional translations display it is adaptation of Scripture’s actual Hebrew wording, to re-write it, and re-fashion it to render it consistent and compatible to tradition. And nothing more than this accounts for how Genesis 2:3 traditionally is rendered, and typically translated:

“So God blessed the seventh day and hallowed it, because on it God rested from all his work which he had done in creation†(RSV Genesis 2:3).

For one immediately presented is here this ludicrous tradition, which is addressed above…

Somehow, “God blessed the seventh day and hallowed itâ€, while, simultaneously he “rested†that day “from all his work which he had done in creationâ€, which even God Almighty can’t possibly have done. This same incongruity and blatant contradiction are tradition, that predominates throughout this scripture, which empties, and replaces its legitimate biblical meaning, and re-writes it in a way, that leaves it little practical meaning, due to how contradiction thus consumes this scripture.

It is almost as if, therefore, the translators here realized, that there is sufficient contradiction in this scripture, without including reference to “all his work, which God had created for the sake of further useâ€, as this verse’s Hebrew is accurately rendered:

“And God bountifully bestowed upon the seventh day, and had made it holy. For in it, he had ceased from all his work, which God had created for the sake of further use” (deMSby Genesis 2:3).

For to what “use†would God put such “workâ€, during his having “rested from all his work which he had done in creation†(RSV Genesis 2:3)?

Which seems traditionally to be God’s agenda throughout “the seventh day†(while simultaneously and at the same time he “blessed the seventh day and hallowed it†[RSV Genesis 2:3]). To what additional or “further use†could God have applied this above mentioned “workâ€, while he merely “rested†throughout “the seventh dayâ€, as is inferred by traditional translation?

Thus, that the reader be spared this dilemma, and needn’t be concerned about such “further useâ€, the biblical Hebrew wording is dissembled somewhat, and is given a translation, that fashions as reflection of predominant tradition:

“So God blessed the seventh day and hallowed it, because on it God rested from all his work which he had done in creation†(RSV Genesis 2:3).

For as we did initially note, a person nothing does, while he is at “restâ€. And of “his work†makes no “further useâ€, while at his “restâ€, and thereby effectively is doing nothing. And thus speaks tradition of God’s “seventh dayâ€, which Genesis 2:3 (RSV) well exhibits, and exemplifies.

4Like Exodus 20:11, Exodus 31:17 has two; yes two equally accurate translations. Yes: This verse has two accurate renderings.

But you can see, how a translator’s choice of one or the other is somewhat predestined, and predetermined is by way of his choice of tradition’s translation of Exodus 20:11, or his choosing the de MontSabbathby Version of Exodus 20:11.

For once having chosen the traditional translation, his treatment of a related, later scripture must representative be, and consistent must be to what he has previously done in translation. And that is specifically the reason why the Almighty is “refreshed†in this verse, Exodus 31:17, rather than the seventh day’s having been “restored†(deMSby Exodus 31:17).

Because: In Exodus 20:11, which “comes before†Exodus 31:17, all the traditional, established translations record, that Almighty God “rested the seventh dayâ€, which must determine, and stipulate how they ultimately treat this related, later verse, Exodus 31:17…

They must together say, and must in unison profess, and avow, as has their tradition long given them to predicate: God, the Almighty “was refreshed†on “the seventh day†(KJV Exodus 31:17).

Which sounds as strange and unbiblical to them, as does it to us, and recites it to us. But they so committed are to our traditions, as to make greater urgency of them than Scripture.

They to tradition are much more attentive, than are they attentive to Scripture itself. And that must determine how they translate, and exhibit this scripture, Exodus 31:17, recalling, that God, the Almighty “was refreshedâ€.

Posted in

de MontSabbathby

Categories

Subscribe!